|
| |
Dan Raymer's book "Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach" is the
textbook for many aircraft design capstone undergraduate courses. It
covers almost all aspects of conceptual design, including initial sizing,
configuration layout, aerodynamics, propulsion, stability & control, mass
properties, and structures and materials. The notes appended here provide some
cross-references and annotations.
Characteristics of the standard atmosphere are
listed in Appendix B. However, a procedure for calculating the
characteristics of the atmosphere at an arbitrary altitude is not described in
the book. If a
spreadsheet is used to simulate the mission, a knowledge of pressure, density,
temperature and the speed of sound is essential for mission analysis. A
description of the atmosphere up to the top of the stratosphere (about 65,600
ft), can be found here, along
with an accompanying Excel spreadsheet.
There are also websites where the calculations can be performed, such as
http://www.digitaldutch.com/atmoscalc/.
Raymer's website (www.aircraftdesign.com)
also contains a cornucopia of useful information, plus links to other websites.
Key Benefits
 | These annotations provide cross references to other textbooks such as those of Nicolai, Roskam,
McCormick and Torenbeek. |
 | They assist the student in understanding the text, and provide additional
complementary analysis. |
Terminology
These annotations use the same terminology as for Raymer's
text, with a few exceptions. There is one particular area where Raymer's definitions can (and do)
cause some confusion with students. This area is the terminology of
components of drag due to lift. Raymer defines drag due to lift and
induced drag as being one and the same thing. On page 307 he states that
"Drag forces that are a strong function of lift are known as induced drag or
drag due to lift". However, McCormick (p.186) makes the observation
that "Strictly speaking, this definition of CDi {induced drag] is not correct.
Although it has become practice to charge to CDi any drag increase
associated with CL, some of this increase results from the dependency
of the parasite drag on the angle of attack. What, then, is a more precise
definition of CDi? Very simply, the induced drag at a given CL
can be defined as the drag that the wing would experience in an inviscid flow at
the same CL." This is a good enough definition, ignoring
for a moment the problem that a wing could experience neither lift nor drag in
an inviscid flow because the Kutta condition at the trailing edge would not be
met.
These annotations more closely follow the definitions in Nicolai (pp. 11-7 to
11-9), in which
drag due to lift is broken down into two parts:
 | Viscous drag due to lift, which in turn is comprised of incremental skin
friction drag due to lift and incremental pressure and separation drag due to
lift. Increased local velocities on the upper
surface of the wing due to increase in circulation result in additional skin friction drag.
Changes in
boundary layer thickness and separation also increase pressure drag.
These effects are manifest in airfoil section drag polars (such as those shown
in Raymer Appendix D). |
 | Inviscid drag due to lift, in which wing tip vortices induce a downwash on
the wing, causing the local lift vector to be tilted aft. If the local
lift vector is then resolved normal to and parallel to the free stream flow, an
additional drag component appears, which is defined in these annotations to be
induced drag. In these annotations (although not in Raymer's text),
induced drag therefore excludes the effects of viscous drag due to lift.
|
Viewing Documents on this Website
Most documents on this website are in portable
document format (pdf) and may be viewed using Adobe Reader.
Typographical Errors
Every textbook has some typographical errors. Raymer's text has its
share, and here are some
corrections.
|
 |
The Avro Vulcan (left) and Boeing B-47 (right) were
designed for similar missions, but designers took very different approaches.
The British favored buried engines for reduced skin friction drag (e.g Handley Page
Victor, Vickers Valiant, de Havilland Comet) and delta wing. Boeing favored podded engines
on a high aspect ratio wing. This was the forerunner of all
long-range commercial aircraft designs. |
 |
Organization
Annotations are organized by chapter and section, following Raymer's
numbering system and section titles. Not all sections are annotated. Within each
annotation both figures and equations are numbered by chapter and section [e.g. Eq. (17.2.3)], rather than just by chapter (as in Raymer), so that they will be
differentiated from Raymer's figures and equations. Click on a link below
to go to the annotation for that section. Linked section annotations are in
portable document format (pdf). Additional notes are supplied here that provide links to other webs.
| Chapter 1 Design - A Separate Discipline |
|
| Chapter 2 Overview of the Design Process |
|
| Chapter 3 Sizing from a Conceptual Sketch |
|
|
3.3 Empty-Weight Estimation |
 | Linear relationships between Takeoff Gross
Weight (TOGW) and Empty Weight (EW) correlate equally well with
exponential relationships, and are more intuitive. |
|
|
3.4 Fuel Fraction Estimation |
 | The Avro Vulcan has a minimum drag
coefficient that is much lower than that of the B-47, but the maximum L/D
is about the same. Drag polars illustrate how this can happen.
|
 | Maximum L/D can be estimated analytically
based only on wing span and aircraft wetted area. Results correlate
well with aircraft data. |
 | Derivation of fuel fraction allowances is
explained. |
|
|
3.5
Takeoff-Weight Calculation |
 | An alternative method is described for estimating TOGW to fulfill a
mission. It is more intuitive than the method described in Raymer's
book, and provides graphical insights into the sensitivity of TOGW to
fixed weights. |
|
|
3.6 Design
Example: ASW Aircraft |
 | The sensitivity of TOGW to fixed weights can be derived analytically.
An example is provided for a Boeing 707-320. |
|
| Chapter 4
Airfoil and Geometry Selection |
|
|
4.2 Airfoil Selection |
 | Drag due to lift has two components: inviscid drag due to lift
(or induced drag), and viscous drag due to lift. 2-D airfoils
exhibit viscous drag due to lift, but not induced drag. |
 | Airfoil maximum L/D may, or may not, occur at the same lift
coefficient as an airplane whose wing has the same airfoil section. |
|
|
4.5 Tail Geometry and Arrangement |
 | Selection of design parameters for the horizontal and vertical
stabilizer involves many tradeoffs, including that of whether the design
looks stylish. |
|
| Chapter 5 Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Wing Loading |
|
|
5.3 Wing
Loading |
 | The required maximum wing lift coefficient depends many factors, such
as landing field length, type of mission, and weight and maintenance of
flap systems. An example is given of how a change in mission resulted in a
redesign of the flap system for the Boeing 747. |
 | For a given rate of climb at a specified speed and altitude, a value
of wing loading (W/S) exists for which the required thrust/weight ratio
(T/W) is a minimum. If speed is a variable, required T/W is
independent of W/S. |
|
|
5.4 Selection of Thrust to Weight and Wing Loading |
 | Chapter 5 contains enough information to generate a performance
constraint plot (or sizing matrix plot) to enable a first estimation of
required T/W and W/S. |
|
| Chapter 6 Initial Sizing |
|
| Chapter 7 Configuration Layout and Loft |
|
|
7.4 Conic Fuselage Development |
 | The value of the conic shape parameter for a circular arc can proven
to be 0.4142. The procedure for fuselage conic lofting is
summarized. |
|
|
7.8
Wing/Tail Layout and Loft |
 | Difficulties with adding winglets to an existing wing design are
described. New winglet shapes will alleviate these difficulties. |
|
| Chapter 8 Special Considerations in Configuration Layout |
|
| Chapter 9 Crew Station, Passengers, and Payload |
|
| Chapter 10 Propulsion and Fuel System Integration |
|
| Chapter 11 Landing Gear and Subsystems |
|
| Chapter 12 Aerodynamics |
|
|
12.2
Aerodynamic Forces |
 | The definition of induced drag in these annotations is different from
the textbook. The revised definition also requires some revisions to
the definitions in Figure 12.2. |
|
|
12.3 Aerodynamic Coefficients |
 | A drag count is the drag coefficient X104. Always
show drag coefficients to four decimal places. |
|
|
12.5 Parasite (Zero-Lift) Drag |
 | A simple tabular method is described for calculating airplane
zero-lift drag. |
|
|
12.6 Drag due
to Lift (Induced Drag) |
 | More detailed methods are available for calculating Oswald efficiency
factor that include fuselage effects. |
 | At high supersonic and hypersonic Mach numbers, the induced drag
factor (K) becomes two-dimensional (independent of aspect ratio) because
most of the flow over the wing is not affected by the existence of wing
tips. |
|
| Chapter 13 Propulsion |
|
|
13.6 Piston Engine Performance |
 | Equation 13.14 (requiring an integral) will
calculate propeller activity factor. John Lowry has prepared a
spreadsheet that will do the calculation (provided that the required data
is input) which is available
http://www.avweb.com/news/airman/182418-1.html?type=pf. |
 | Figure 13.11 shows the ratio of thrust
coefficient to power coefficient (CT/CP) for one design case. For
additional activity factors, blade design CL, and number of blades, a pdf from Lan & Roskam can be found
here. |
 | Figure 13.12 shows CP for one design case. For
additional activity factors, blade design CL, and number of blades, (pdfs
are also from Lan & Roskam), click
here for 3-bladed propellers, and
here for 4-blades propellers. |
|
| Chapter 14 Structures and Loads |
|
| Chapter 15 Weights |
|
| Chapter 16 Stability, Control, and Handling Qualities |
|
|
16.3 Longitudinal Static Stability and Control |
 | A configuration that is statically stable must have two
characteristics: the derivative of the pitching moment coefficient
with respect to angle of attack must be negative, and the forward and aft
lifting surfaces must exhibit décalage.
|
 | Horizontal stabilizer sizing requires use of a "notch chart" to find
the minimum horizontal stabilizer area that will meet all the static
longitudinal control requirements. |
|
|
16.4
Lateral-Directional Static Stability and Control |
 | Sizing the vertical stabilizer requires either meeting a required Cnβ
or maintaining directional control when an engine fails on a multi-engined
airplane. |
|
| Chapter 17 Performance and Flight Mechanics |
|
|
17.2
Steady Level Flight |
 | Procedures for finding speed and lift coefficient for maximum L/D are
described. |
 | For a highly cambered airfoil, finding the lift coefficient for
maximum L/D is a bit more involved than for a symmetric airfoil. |
 | Cruise optimization using step-climb techniques are used in mission
analysis programs. |
 | Worldwide wind data are available for input to mission analysis
programs. |
|
|
17.3 Steady Climbing and Descending Flight |
 | FAR Part 25 has specific climb requirements after takeoff. These
must be calculated for different flight conditions with landing gear and
flaps up or down. |
|
|
17.6 Energy-Maneuverability Methods |
 | Just two equations (or one if they are combined) are needed to
calculate constraint lines on a T/W versus W/S plot for almost all aerial
maneuvers. |
|
| Chapter 18 Cost Analysis |
|
|
18.7 Aircraft and Airline Economics |
 | An updated method for calculating Direct Operating Cost plus Interest
(DOC+I) is provided. This is based on a method by Bob Liebeck with
coefficients inflation-adjusted from a base of 1993 to 2009 values. |
|
| Chapter 19 Sizing and Trade Studies |
|
|
19.3 Improved Conceptual Sizing Methods |
 | Eq. (19.8) can be derived from equations in Chapter 17. Rate of
climb is normally performed at a constant indicated airspeed until an
optimum cruise Mach number is reached. |
|
| Chapter 20 Vertical Flight - Jet and Prop |
|
| Chapter 21 Extremes of Flight |
|
| Chapter 22 Design of Unique Aircraft Concepts |
|
| Chapter 23 Conceptual Design Examples
|
|
| Appendix A: Unit Conversion |
|
| Appendix B: Standard Atmosphere |
|
| Appendix C: Airspeed |
|
| Appendix D: Airfoil Data |
|
| Appendix E: Typical Engine Performance
Curves |
|
| Appendix F: Design Requirements and
Specifications |
 | Calculation of FAR Part 36 Noise Calculations is computationally
intensive. This
PowerPoint
presentation describes the basic procedures but does not provide
sufficient information to calculate noise levels for a specific
configuration. |
 | For a specific configuration, see the example procedure in the notes
for the AIAA 2008-2009 competition. |
 | Some changes to FAR Part 25 in values and definitions were made in
1996. An update to Table F.4 to reflect these changes is included in the
Annotations to Section 17.3. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
References
In these
annotations, references will usually be described by author. Some
references are provided at the end of the section:
Hoerner
Hoerner, S.F., "Fluid-Dynamic Drag", Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1965.
Lan & Roskam Lan, C-T.
E., and Roskam, J., "Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance, First Edition", The
University of Kansas, 1980. Note: A second edition has been published.
McCormick
McCormick, B. W., "Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Dynamics", John Wiley &
Sons, 1979.
Nicolai Nicolai, L., "Fundamentals
of Aircraft Design", METS Inc, 1975.
Shevell
Shevell, R., "Fundamentals of Flight, Second Edition", Prentice Hall, 1983.
Torenbeek Torenbeek, E., "Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design", Delft University Press,
1982.
All of these books (and more listed in the
bibliography to this website) should be owned by an aspiring aircraft designer.
References will also be made to the
Federal Aviation Regulations (officially known as 14 CFR, or Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations). Before this information was
available online, an up-to-date copy could be found in every aerodynamics and
performance department. Make sure that you are viewing the FARs from the US
Government website. Other websites have copies, but they may not be
current.

|